Model Options:
- Overview
- Specs
- Manufacturer Info
- Also Purchased
- Video & Docs
Recommended Accessories
ex VAT
inc VAT
ex VAT
inc VAT
ex VAT
inc VAT
ex VAT
inc VAT
For those of you seeking vintage Gibson tone, look, feel and vibe, there is the Gibson Les Paul 60s Tribute Electric Guitar. With a Mahogany body, Maple top and 60’s slim profile Mahogany neck, the Les Paul 60s Tribute captures the feel and look of those vintage guitars. BurstBucker 1 and BurstBucker 2 pickups give the PAF tone and are extremely versatile.
Gibson Les Paul 60s Tribute Electric Guitar Specifications
- Body: Mahogany /’Traditional’ weight relief
- Top: Maple
- Neck: Mahogany, 60’s Slim Profile
- Fingerboard: Rosewood, Trapezoid Inlays
- Hardware: Chrome Tune-o-Matic, Grover Kidney Tuners
- Electronics: BB1/ BB2 Chrome covers
- Plastics: Black, Speed knobs
- Special Notes: ‘2013 Model’ on back of headstock, ‘60’s Tribute’ Truss Rod Cover
- Case: Premium Gig Bag
ex VAT
inc VAT
-
ex VAT
inc VAT
ex VAT
inc VAT
ex VAT
inc VAT
-
|
Price Match - Guarantee
Price Match - Guarantee
Price Match - Guarantee
Price Match - Guarantee
Minimum Item Quantity 1 is required to purchase.
Item Quantity exceeds the limit 0 . Questions? Feel free to Call or Chat.
Bob from USA
| Rating |
  |
| Quality |
|
| Reliability |
|
| General |
|
| Playability and Feel |
|
| Tone |
|
| Finish |
|
| Action |
|
|
|
| Great Bang for the Buck |
| Quality |
| Would you consider this product to be made well? How dependable? |
| I feel these Studio Tribute series guitars are a really nice guitar, especially for the money. These are in my opinion higher quality that the Traditionals and Standards (see below). |
|
| Reliability |
| How has it stood up over time? |
| Solid Gibson construction. I don't have to treat the guitar with kids gloves for it to still respect me. Stays in tune well. |
|
| General |
| Your general opinion of this product. |
| I feel this guitar offers you everything you need in a Les Paul (mahogany body, maple top, rosewood fretboard, etc) and nothing you don't need (like a high-gloss finish, cheap plastic body and neck binding). |
|
| Playability and Feel |
| How does it feel, Heavy, Fast, Chunky? How was the neck? Are the controls easy to get to while playing? |
| I am pretty picky about how a guitar plays since I have been through multiple hand surgeries. I find this guitar to play very well. I am actually able to play a string gauge thicker on this guitar because it plays so easily. The 60's neck is nice. It fills my hand nicely and keeps my hand in a relaxed position. This 60's neck doesn't appear to be as thin as a 60's Les Paul Classic, for instance. But it is still in the same ballpark. |
|
| Tone |
| Bright and snappy? Dark and smooth? Were the pickups hot, mellow, thick, thin? |
| I am a little disappointed with the choice of Burstbucker 1 & 2 for this guitar. The Burstbuckers are a little too modern for my taste and this guitar feels very vintage. If I had my choice I would have preferred '57 Classics. The weight relieved body produces a nice woody and airy tone. |
|
| Finish |
| How did the stain or paint job look? |
| Little story, I purchases 2 Les Paul Traditionals and a Standard before deciding on this guitar. Both Traditionals had tooling marks on the fret ends, neck binding, and fretboard. There was orange peel paint around the neck pocket, and a place where the stain ran into the binding when they applied the clearcoat. These blems where on BOTH Les Paul Traditionals. The Les Paul Standard was just a very modern and sterile interpretation of a Les Paul, so it went back to.
I had a 60's Tribute and I sold it to "upgrade" to the Traditional or Standard because they were the "better" guitar. Well, long story short, I ended up right back at the 60's Tribute. |
|
| Action |
| How was the action out of the box? |
| The action was a touch high out of the box, but it adjusted easily without causing fret buzz. |
|
|
|