| TJG from Mountain View, CA - USA |
| Overall Ranking: |
| Features:
|   |
| Ease of Use:
| |
| Quality:
| |
| Sound:
| |
| Subject: | Good value system for smaller spaces - meeting rooms, etc. |
| Quality:
| Just received it. So far so good. |
| Features:
| Search for wireless mikes is what prompted the purchase. I would definitely add a MIXER to the package. It wan't clear when ordering that I would also need this. |
| Ease of Use:
| Easy to use, once I figured it out. Info sheet (AKA manual) was less than helpful to a novice. Needed a diagram as to where to plug what in! Would have helped to know how to connect everything together - MIXER and speakers. |
| Sound:
| We hooked it up to our BOSE speakers in our CD/radio. Haven't tried it out in a large room....yet - sounds fine at home. Have to be careful about feedback, though. |
| Do you own this product?:
| yes |
| Date submitted:
| 3/28/09 |
|
|
| JDMSeattle from Bremerton, WA USA |
|
| Overall Ranking: |
| Quality:
| |
| Features:
| |
| Value:
| |
| Ease of Use:
| |
| Sound:
| |
| Subject: | You Get What You Pay For... |
| Quality:
| Only one of them works most of the time. It has caused me great embarrassment at two weddings. There is nothing worse than when the best man or brides Father goes to give a toast and the mics do not work. |
| Features:
| Small, easy to set up |
| Ease of Use:
| Easy to use. If you can plug in a speaker cord, you can use these. |
| Sound:
| When it works, the tone is ok. Not great, but ok. |
| Value:
| No...not even worth the little money spent. I do not hold AMS responsible for this, its the manufacturer's fault. Very disappointing because Nady usually makes quality stuff. |
| Do you own this product?:
| Yes |
| Date submitted:
| 7/27/09 |
|
|
| Mike Wiles from Huntsville, AL, USA |
| Overall Ranking: |
| Quality:
| |
| Features:
| |
| Value:
| |
| Ease of Use:
| |
| Sound:
| |
| Subject: | Surprisingly good for the price |
| Quality:
| The microphones are lightweight. But, they seem well-made. The receiver seems to be constructed at least as well as more expensive units. |
| Features:
| Having two receivers in one box is helpful with limited available channels. It only provides a 1/4" output, which worked fine for the situation is it used in. It seems like the overall output level is less than Shure and AT units. But, I was still able to get a good, useable signal level. |
| Ease of Use:
| The unit is very easy to configure. Plug it into a channel, plug in the power supply, and turn it on. You have individual channels for each mic so they can be leveled at the unit. |
| Sound:
| I'm using this unit in a small, country church to help the pastor to be heard over the window air-conditioners. It seems like the overall output level is less than Shure and AT units. But, I was still able to get a good, usable signal level. These microphones don't seem to be prone to feedback in this situation. The sound seems good as well. |
| Value:
| I can still hardly believe that I got two decent-working, wireless microphones shipped to me for less than $50. This is a tremendous value. |
| Do you own this product?:
| Yes |
| Date submitted:
| July 21, 2009 |
|
|
| Antoine M. Alonzo from Passaic Park, NJ, USA |
| amalonzo@yahoo.com |
| Overall Ranking: |
| Features:
| |
| Ease of Use:
| |
| Quality:
| |
| Sound:
| |
| Subject: | Nady DKW Duo VHF Handheld Wireless Microphone System as BACKUP |
| Quality:
| I could not believe it when one of the singers actually asked for this microphone than the Shure PGX. I bought this as a backup. Believe me, I could not tell the difference between Shure's and Nady in terms of quality. |
| Features:
| Just have enough features to be useful, just likeeveryone elses. |
| Ease of Use:
| It is lighter. the nine-volt battery is not I prefer, however, we always have a stack of them for our stomp boxes. This system is plug and play, no configuration necessary. |
| Sound:
| Believe me, I could not tell the difference between Shure's and Nady in terms of quality. Maybe even more transparent than the others. |
| Do you own this product?:
| Yes, now B and D, plus the P and R channels |
| Date submitted:
| April 25, 2009 |